26.5 C
Lagos
Wednesday, February 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 2081

‘Initiate binding mechanisms to hold Shell accountable for pollutions’

imageThe Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) and a coalition of non-governmental organisations on the platform of the Europe-Third World Centre (CETIM) and Friends of the Earth International want the United Nations Human Rights Council to initiate uniform binding mechanism that will involve preventive measures covering environmental and human rights abuses to compel Shell and other transnational oil companies to take responsibility for their human rights violations.

In a catalogue of violations with Shell’s footprints in the Niger Delta, the group drew the attention of the Council to the limitation of international and local advocacies as well as national regulatory agencies to compel Shell to respect human rights in the Niger delta.

The petition, submitted by ERA/FoEN Executive Director, Godwin Uyi Ojo, at the 26thsession of the Council, reads: “Shell refuses to respect the regulatory agencies, national governments and the laws of the land, making it look as if the regulated have become the regulator. This level of impunity demonstrates the dire need for an international mechanism to hold companies to account uniformly rather than allowing for voluntary company mechanisms that are subject to manipulation and are not legally binding.

“A global treaty to hold corporations accountable will bring to an end environmental racism being perpetrated by Shell in adherence to international standards in Europe while lowering standards in Nigeria and in less developed countries. Since the political and economic power of corporations challenge national governments as is the case in Nigeria, legally binding global instrument is necessary to check undue corporate influence.”

The groups challenged the status quo which it described as “ineffective manipulative compensation regime”, insisting that prior and informed consent must be a condition to negotiate with the communities.

Issues addressed in the petition include oil pollution, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report, Shell’s Bonga Spill and gas flaring.

 

Oil Pollution

On widespread oil pollution in the Niger Delta the groups said that once fertile wetlands have been transformed by the constant leaks into the world’s largest oil disaster even as they noted that between 2004 and 2007, spills from Shell facilities destroyed fish ponds and farmlands in the Bodo and Goi communities in Rivers State. In 2004, a major oil spill from the Trans-Niger pipeline which runs through Ogoniland to the Bonny Export Terminal destroyed livelihoods including fish-ponds, a poultry coop and a bakery belonging to Chief Barizaa Dooh, one of the plaintiffs in the case. Dooh’s community has been rendered completely uninhabitable. In 2005, the Oruma community in Bayelsa State also suffered a similar fate from Shell’s facility, which destroyed fish-ponds, farms and trees, losing their sources of livelihood. In the 2007 Ikot Ada oil spill case, the community suffered from pollution of their farmlands, ponds and community lands.

In response, ERA/FoEN and its sister organisation, the Netherlands-based Milieudefensie, took Shell to court in The Hague to seek environmental clean-up and compensation for the victims’ loss of livelihood, including destruction of farmlands and fish-ponds in the Goi, Oruma and Ikot Ada Udo communities.

 

UNEP Report

The groups also made reference to the assessment of Ogoniland prepared by UNEP and released on 4 August 2011, which showed hydrocarbon pollution in surface water throughout the creeks of Ogoniland up to 8 cm and in groundwater that feeds drinking wells at 41 sites, including a serious case at Nisisioken Ogale in Eleme, Rivers State. Soils were found to have been polluted with hydrocarbons up to a depth of five metres in 49 observed sites, while benzene, a known carcinogen, was found in drinking water at a level 900 times above World Health Organisation (WHO) acceptable levels.

 

Shell’s Bonga Spill

The Shell Bonga oil spill which occurred on 20 December 2011, during which 40,000 barrels of crude oil spilled into the Atlantic Ocean, was also cited. The communities alleged that harmful chemical dispersants such as Slickgone NS, Corexit 9500 and 9527 and Biosolve, among others, which Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited used to breakdown and disperse the spilled crude at Bonga field, in turn spread to the fishing areas, where they became the causes of the diseases afterward prevalent in the communities.

Common ailments affecting the communities included mental disorders; hypertension; eye irritations; nose, throat and skin lesions; vomiting and rectal bleeding; liver and kidney damage; short-term memory loss and confusion; respiratory problems; miscarriages; blood in urine.

Following this Bonga oil spill, the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA) imposed a $5 billion fine on Shell. The Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) Director General, Patrick Akpobolokemi, had earlier said at a public hearing organised by the House of Representatives Committee on Environment that the maritime agency calculated a total of $6.5 billion as compensation to be paid to the communities.

ERA/FoEN and Milieudefensie took Shell to court in The Hague, to seek environmental clean-up and compensation for the victims’ loss of livelihood, including destruction of farmlands and fish-ponds in the Goi, Oruma and Ikot Ada Udo communities.

 

Gas Flaring

In the petition, the groups also observed that gas flaring has continued unabated in the Niger Delta with Shell keeping almost 100 gas flares burning, day and night.  They also pointed out that several studies pointing to the devastating effects of gas flaring on people and the environment were cited including a 2011 report which showed that gas flaring has had known effects on the Ogoni people and their environment such as noise pollution, itching and skin rashes, the discomfort generated by the light from the flare sites, black dust and soot that settle in people’s homes and on food and clothes thereby undermining the quality of life and the right of the people to live in a healthy environment in which to fulfill their potential.

Some of the very prominent impacts of gas flaring are acid rain, which acidifies the lakes and streams and damages crops and vegetation, and corrosion of roofs. It is also a known carcinogen which affects human health, including causing miscarriages and congenital malformations, increasing the frequency of respiratory illnesses and cancer, amongst other ailments that have sent hundreds to their early graves. Its sulphur leads to low farm yields, affecting the farming livelihood of the people.

To the issues identified, ERA/FoEN and CETIM demanded a binding mechanism be made uniformly applicable on a global scale, adding that the treaty should involve preventive measures covering environmental and human rights violations rather than the current ineffective manipulative compensation regime.

Activists demand action to end Ogoniland pollution

0

President Goodluck Jonathan of Nigeria has been asked to take urgent action to end the large scale environmental pollution in Ogoniland, a group of oil-producing communities that cuts across Kana, Gokana, Tai and Eleme local government areas (LGAs) in River State.

Goodluck Jonathan, President of Nigeria
Goodluck Jonathan, President of Nigeria

Africa and Middle East Laureates of the Right Livelihood Foundation, who met recently in Cairo, Egypt, voiced their concerns about the ongoing land and sea degradation in Ogoniland and urged the Nigerian President to take action on the Ogoni UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) report, three years after it was submitted.
The 2011 report has shown, for instance, that “in at least 10 Ogoni communities where drinking water is contaminated with high levels of hydrocarbons, public health is seriously threatened”.
The Laureates urged Jonathan to take action on the “full implementation of the recommendations of the UNEP report” taking into consideration “effective participation of the Ogoni people in all stages relating to the restoration of their environment”.
Similarly, the Laureates called on the Congolese government to stop permitting oil exploration in the Virunga National Park, a World Heritage Site and home to around a quarter of the world’s population of endangered mountain gorillas.

Laureates sharing experiences during the regional conference
Laureates sharing experiences during the regional conference

Though they endorsed the recent decision by British oil company, Soco International, to end its exploration work in the Park, they however feared that Soco’s withdrawal is not a total victory, describing the withdrawal as ambiguous, in the light of the fact that the company said it would complete its seismic survey in Lake Edward.
According to the Laureates, exploration licenses cover 80 per cent of the park and other companies may seek to develop resources in the Virunga. They called on the Congolese government to cancel Soco’s permit, to respect national laws and regulations outlawing oil exploration and extraction in protected areas, and to remove armed groups inside the park.
They also called on Soco to unambiguously give up its permit to explore within the park boundaries and to honour its commitment to respect all areas designated as World Heritage Sites by UNESCO.
While demanding a paradigm shift in agriculture and management of natural resources, the 11 Laureates at the four-day conference, declared: “In our diverse struggles toward improving access to health care, ending impunity, and achieving food security and sustainable development, we recognise an overarching crisis afflicting the region. Corporate capture of governance in Africa is becoming increasingly prevalent in the areas of agriculture and the extractive industries, namely mining, oil, and gas.”
They also called upon African governments to “make investments into infrastructure, health and education, especially in rural communities.”
“The Laureates appealed to the heads of states and governments of the African Union to “develop and implement the roadmap for the needed transition towards Ecological Organic Agriculture as promised by the African Heads of States and Governments in the Decision on Organic Farming”.
Additionally, they requested that “national governments implement the Maputo Declaration on Agriculture and Food Security that was declared in 2000, and redirect ten percent of national budget allocation to Ecological Organic Agriculture”.
The forum brought the Laureates together to share their experiences and struggles in their different areas of work: from human rights to environmental protection, women’s health, ecologically and socially sound agriculture, as well as justice and community healing after violent conflict. The event was the second in a series of regional meetings of Right Livelihood Laureates.

Bassey
Bassey

Director, Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF), Nnimmo Bassey, was one of the 11 Laureates at the conference. Bassey (RLA Laureate 2010) and late environmental rights activist, Ken Saro-Wiwa (RLA Laureate 1994), are awardees of the Right Livelihood Award Foundation.

The late Ken Saro-Wiwa
The late Ken Saro-Wiwa

While Saro-Wiwa was decorated “for striving non-violently for civil, economic and environmental rights of his people,” Bassey was honored “for revealing the full ecological and human horrors of oil production and for his inspired work to strengthen the environmental movement in Nigeria and globally”.

Governments recommend actions for Biodiversity Plan implementation

Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at the weekend in Montreal, Canada wrapped up a weeklong meeting on implementation with recommendations on, among others, resource mobilisation, technical and scientific cooperation, poverty eradication and sustainable development, enhancements to the structures and processes under the CBD and engagement with business, local governments and other stakeholders.

de Souza Dia
de Souza Dia

The recommendations agreed at the fifth meeting of the Ad Hoc open-ended Working Group on Review of Implementation of the Convention (WGRI5) will be taken up by the 12th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP-12), scheduled for the first two weeks of October 2014 in PyeongChang, Republic of Korea. Key recommendations from the Montreal meeting may be included in the package of decisions emerging from COP-12 – the so-called “PyeongChang Road Map” – to enhance implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and its 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets, adopted by governments in 2010 at Nagoya, Japan.
“Parties worked hard this week to prepare for our work at COP-12, and have made progress in a number of areas that are key to enhanced implementation of the Convention,” said Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias, executive secretary for the Convention on Biological Diversity. “I believe we made progress towards the targets for resource mobilisation, with language now available that will be a good basis for further negotiations at COP.”
He added: “I am also pleased to see that Parties agreed on the urgency and importance of effectively including biodiversity in the proposed sustainable development goals currently under discussion at the United Nations General Assembly. Biodiversity for Sustainable Development is the theme of COP-12, and discussions to be held at the high level segment will contribute to the global agenda for sustainable development.”
The working group agreed to recommendations that brought together capacity development, technical and scientific cooperation, and better use of the Clearinghouse Mechanism (CHM), in ways that enhance effectiveness and usefulness and to enhance synergies in support of implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020.
Increasing the efficiency of structures and processes under the Convention and its Protocols was also an important agenda item. Parties recommended a consolidation of proceedings for subsequent meetings of the Conference of the Parties to the CBD and meetings of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to current and future protocols to the Convention. Further, the possibility of creating a subsidiary body on implementation, which would replace the WGRI, was also recommended.
The Working Group contributed to the integration of biodiversity in sustainable development and poverty eradication programs by recommending very clear and strong decisions to be considered by COP-12 for adoption. The Chennai Guidance will be a good tool for both biodiversity and development communities to work together to contribute to the implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, in particular Aichi Biodiversity Targets 2 and 14.
Engagement with a variety of other actors was also discussed, with recommendations relating to business, international organizations, subnational and local governments, and the gender mainstreaming plan of the CBD, suggesting ways to enhance the contribution of these to implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, agreed for transmission to COP-12.
The WGRI5 is followed by the 18th meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA-18), which begins on Monday, June 23, 2014. Among others, SBSTTA-18 will present a draft of Global Biodiversity Outlook 4, which will provide a review of the status and trends of biodiversity, as well as a review of the state of implementation of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
The CBD, which opened for signature at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and entered into force in December 1993, is an international treaty for the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of the components of biodiversity and the equitable sharing of the benefits derived from the use of genetic resources.
The 194-Party Convention seeks to address all threats to biodiversity and ecosystem services, including threats from climate change, through scientific assessments, the development of tools, incentives and processes, the transfer of technologies and good practices and the full and active involvement of relevant stakeholders including indigenous and local communities, youth, NGOs, women and the business community.
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety is a subsidiary agreement to the Convention. It seeks to protect biological diversity from the potential risks posed by living modified organisms resulting from modern biotechnology. To date, 166 countries plus the European Union have ratified the Cartagena Protocol.

Why Dangote Cement is creating awareness on quality

CementDangote Cement has explained that its current enlightenment on several radio stations across the country is to educate and inform the public on the benefits of using quality cement especially the new Dangote 42.5 3X Cement in their construction works.
According to Director, Sales & Marketing, South South Region of Dangote Cement, Chux Mogbolu, the public awareness became necessary as research has shown that most cement users in Nigeria cannot differentiate between the various grades of cement and their uses hence leading to application of lower cement grade where higher grade cement is should have been used.
Mogbolu, speaking during a radio programme on Delta Broadcasting Service (DBS) at Asaba, said that because of the abysmal level of knowledge among artisans, block makers, masons and other craftsmen in the building industry, use of 32.5 grade cement in blocking making and house building has resulted in several cases of building collapse.
Describing the qualities of the new 42.5 cement grade, he said that the grinding is better, smoother which makes it to expel pockets of air therefore preventing cracks in pillars, beams and other areas where it is used.  Dangote Cement 42.5 3X public awareness campaign, he stated, is more of a corporate social responsibility project as the company is concerned with the spate of building collapse and the resulting loss of lives and properties.
The Director enjoined the public to always buy Dangote Cement, as they will be buying peace of mind and will build with peace of mind adding that the quality of products from the cement company ensures that customers always come back why the goods do not come back.
It will be recalled that, as part of efforts towards eliminating the menace of building collapse, the Standard Organisation of Nigeria (SON) embarked on the standardisation of the basic inputs in building and construction like Iron and steel, roofing materials. Having completed standardisation in other areas, the agency set out to review cement standard. It adopted a holistic approach as to ensure that standards are maintained in all spheres of the building process.
Following widespread protests over rampant building collapse, the regulatory agency took the commendable step of immediate response to review cement standards in the country.  The technical committee of SON consulted widely with stakeholders from all sectors including the Nigeria Society of Engineers, COREN, universities, researchers, builders, block makers towards fashioning a suitable cement standard regime.
The stakeholders agreed to streamline cement types, with 42.5 cement for general purposes while 32.5 will now be restricted to plastering work. SON’s effort at reviewing cement type standard is commendable as it will restore sanity to the system.

World Bank invests in $120m Abuja shopping mall

IFC boosts investments in deluxe and 5-star hotels in Burma, Tanzania, Ethiopia and Zambia. It says its support to luxury shopping malls in Kenya and Nigeria is supposed to boost “food security”
IFC boosts investments in deluxe and 5-star hotels in Burma, Tanzania, Ethiopia and Zambia. It says its support to luxury shopping malls in Kenya and Nigeria is supposed to boost “food security”

The IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, has announced a $9.5 million investment in Jabi Lake Mall to support demand for modern business infrastructure and retail space in Abuja, Nigeria. The project will help create about 350 construction jobs and 900 long-term, retail-sector jobs.
The $120 million Jabi Lake Shopping Mall is being built on five hectares of land on the Jabi Lake waterfront at Jabi, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. Once complete, it will be Nigeria’s largest shopping mall with over 30,000 square meters of shopping space. The project’s primary sponsor is the Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 2. Dual Properties is the joint venture partner alongside Actis.
Ms. Amanda Jean Baptiste, Director, Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 2, said, “Investing in the Jabs Lake Mall demonstrates Actis’s commitment to developing world-class retail destinations and adding to the domestic infrastructure in Nigeria, as well as our support for the growing demands of a rapidly changing economy. Our partnership with IFC will help us draw on their expertise in international best practice in the environmental and social aspects of the project that affect property development.”
Solomon Adegbie-Quaynor, IFC Country Manager for Nigeria, said, “Our investment is part of IFC’s strategy to help strengthen business infrastructure, contribute to economic growth, and increase job opportunities in Nigeria. Actis is a strong partner in this regard, that can also transfer best modern retail practices”.
Jabs Lake Mall will be the largest retail development of international standard in Abuja and create links to the local economy throughout its construction and operation. It will create new sales channels for Nigerian retailers, including local small and medium enterprises. Its construction will provide business opportunities for local suppliers of food, construction materials and services, and will serve as a catalyst for urban development in the area around the mall.
Construction began on the project in late 2013 and is expected to be completed in 2015.
The IFC is the largest global development institution focused exclusively on the private sector. Working with private enterprises in more than 100 countries, IFC uses its capital, expertise, and influence to help eliminate extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity. In FY13, its investments climbed to an all-time high of nearly $25 billion, leveraging the power of the private sector to create jobs and tackle the world’s most pressing development challenges.

Coping with two extremes

0

Two migrants fall victim of the vagaries of extreme weather conditions in Lagos, where drought and floods have colluded to make life a hell on earth for residents. The main character in this story is the infamous downpour of Sunday, June 10, 2011

 

A flooded neighbourhood off Allen Avenue, Ikeja after the June 2011 rainfall
A flooded neighbourhood off Allen Avenue, Ikeja after the June 2011 rainfall

In July 2009, unemployed single mother of two children, Luisa Ono, ventured into rice faming after receiving a training on: “Rice for Job Project” by officials of the Lagos State Ministry of Agriculture, who enlightened participants on the supposedly lucrative business of cultivating Ofada Rice, and encouraged them to farm.

With her savings, she plunged into the business and was allocated one hectare of land to do the farming at Udena in Ogun State. Full of zeal and expectations, she brought in farm workers from Edo State to till the ground. Diligently, she followed all the stages advised by the agric officers, applying the herbicides, fertiliser and weeding at the directed time.

But she got what she did not bargain for: the rains were suddenly nowhere to be found and, unkindly, drought set in. The Agriculture Ministry officers, who apparently gave little tutorials in terms of the vagaries of weather, allegedly ignored pleas to help provide irrigation, such that the rice got blistered and led to an appalling harvest. The almost N300,000 invested in the venture went down the drain as there was not a single grain of rice to show for her effort.

But she was undeterred, she says, picking up the pieces of her life and she forged ahead.

Her words: “A year later, we were told to form a group of 10 farmers each and register with the Ministry of Agriculture for a World Bank grant under the Fadama Rice Farming Project. This was not without some financial implications and opening of bank account with contributions from the 10 of us, I being the only woman in this group. I spent up to N100,000 in contribution and all other expenses of transportation to the farm and meetings.”

According to Ono, members of the group were allocated six hectares of land, which they paid for. They likewise paid for the harrow, planting, herbicide and fertiliser, in an apparent bid to access the promised World Bank funding via the Lagos State Ministry of Agriculture.

But, alas, lightning struck the second time.

She says, “The 2010 farm yield again was poor due to limited rainfall and we did not realise anything from the rice farm and neither did we get the grant from the World Bank till date.”

Several kilometres away in Igbe, a farming community in Ikorodu unfolds a similar drama. Basil Oru, a peasant farmer, moans over the unsavoury scenario that has played out in recent years. He is one of the numerous migrant growers from the South-Eastern part of the country who have over the decades made Igbe their home. But the increasing temperatures along with the irregular rainfall pattern is affecting farm yield and threatening their source of livelihood, he discloses.

“The rain has not come and it is delaying the planting of certain crops whose cultivation coincides with the advent of the rainy season. The ripening of crops cultivated several months ago is also being delayed because of the late rainfall. And the heat is too much and it is affecting the plants and the soil. We are also losing our farmland because the land is being sold, in most cases without our knowledge, to people who wish to build homes and other commercial ventures,” Oru explains.

According to him, the state government has never come to their aid to alleviate their plight. He notes that some of his colleagues are forced to go into other ventures like riding okada (commercial motorcycle), working as security guards or trading, in order to make ends meet.

He stresses that, to adapt to the situation, he deals more in plantain cultivation, which he claims is resistant to harsh weather conditions. To complement this, he adds, he has shifted the farming site to swampy land, apparently because the soil there is still laden with moisture despite the drought condition upland on the conventional farmland.

Several weeks after this interview with him, Oru’s prayers were heard as the rains came, albeit intermittently. But that of Sunday, June 10 was unprecedented. It started at about 5.00am and poured continuously all through the day in torrents. Oru has stopped rejoicing for the rains he had prayed for; now, he is lamenting.

“A lot of the cassava I planted in March that is to be harvested in about 10-12 months’ time have become rotten due to too much water as a result of the flood that affected my farm. About one hectare and half of cassava farmland is affected,” he groans. “I am desperately trying to save over 100 plantain tress affected by flood, as the leaves are getting discoloured. I am currently creating a channel to drain away the flood water here.”

But Ono’s plight, it appears, is worse off. Smarting from her previous experiences, her house hunt had led her to a rented three-bedroom bungalow at Orisha in Magodo, where she has been residing since January.

She recalls “I prepared my children for church and off we went with our umbrellas. The rain increased its tempo from time to time and, at 2pm having waited for it to stop or abate to some reasonable extent but to no avail, I waded in with my two children, my church being some five minutes distance to Berger. We walked to the Ojodu-Berger Roundabout in search of transport. Commercial vehicles were unavailable due to the rain that had been falling incessantly. With only our heads and shoulders saved from the downpour because of our umbrella, we managed to engage a Keke Napep (commercial tricycle) who finally agreed to drop us at Orisha.

“On getting home, the rain continued. Meanwhile, my compound is situated down a hill and the house up the hill directly behind my compound four months ago built a gigantic fence. While the fence was being constructed, my landlord being an engineer approached the owner of the fence to utilise professional advice on the erection as that compound is known as a passage way for high speed water. He assured my landlord that the fence would have an opening for the water to find its way through.

“The owner of the fence had severally refused sound counsel on how to tackle the annual rush of water through his compound. He continued raising fences that block the passage way, thus leading to the collapse of these fences from time to time. These collapsed fences affect houses beneath, by falling close to them, sending debris or collapsing the sand on the hill and blocking doorways and windows of houses close to the section of the collapsed fence. All these I learnt after the incident as residents who came to the scene relayed their experience with the water and the fence.

“At 4pm that Sunday evening, I observed the intensity of the rain, the water from the top of the hill found openings at the sides of the fence, gushing out dangerously and digging chunks of sand that were falling close to my kitchen door and increasing the level of water to the kitchen steps. I watched dejectedly and made up my mind to move my family outside the bungalow as the water was going to flow in. I stepped inside the kitchen and bolted the door, placing rags under the door to control the rush of water and called out to my children to move over to the font of our home.

“While outside, I heard an ear-deafening and heavy crash, smash, breaking of glasses and mad rush of muddy water that rose inside the living room. The concrete fence had fallen against the house, crushed the sand beneath it, and pillars of concrete crashed into the house, smashed the kitchen iron door where I was standing minutes before and breaking glass windows and pouring in mud, water and dirt.

“I rushed to my bedroom to see to my important documents and certificates; boxes, beddings clothing, and everything was covered in thick mud flowing everywhere. The rain continued and the flood continued from the kitchen whose door had been destroyed by the concrete pillars protruding inside the house with iron rods and chunks of the concrete all over the floor. It was terrible.

“This incident took place between 5-6pm and neighbours could only come at about 8pm when the rain had subsided. We were advised to seek alternative shelter for the night. The whole compound apart from the front and the roof was covered with sand that extended to window and door levels and the gigantic fence broken into three huge boulders dangled on top of the sand posing further danger till now. My furniture, electronics, rug carpets, books and clothing, food items and kitchen utensils were all destroyed. These are replaceable items compared to our life and limbs that God protected. My laminated certificates I was able to clean and dry though sips of mud got into them.

“On Monday July 11, the Zone B Landlord Association in Orisha went up the hill to meet the owner of the fallen fence. He refused to come out and was rather mourning the loss of the fence he said he constructed with N2 million. Imagine!

“Up till now, nothing has been heard from the owner of the fence, even though my landlord has begun evacuating the sand with local labour and cracking the concrete behind to create access to the kitchen door that is twisted and suspended with sand and concrete. Subsequent rains make water from the hill to flow through the fallen fence directly through the open kitchen, into the living room, filling it up and sipping through the front door, bringing with it mud and dirt. We continue to bail water each time it rains. The owner of the fence stands each morning on the hill with his wife or visitors glancing down on his fallen fence and not a word of sympathy, or enquiry as to whether persons in the house are safe.”

Indeed, Ono is exasperated with her experiences in Lagos, and she desperately seeks some sort of succour. “I don’t know why I have become a victim of these incidents in Lagos State; I have just spent seven months in this house and would like to move out for safety of my life and children if I have the means. I want a safe haven free from violence and disasters.”

Environmental activist, Titilope Akosa, attributes the scenarios to extreme weather conditions as a result of global warming that, according to her, results in sea level rise, flooding, drought, storm surges, irregular rainfall pattern and rise in temperature in the state and beyond.

She says, “The current and potential impacts of climate change in Lagos indicate that the phenomenon will affect men and women differently and that climate change may likely exacerbate the existing gender inequality skewed against women. In Lagos, women constitute a significant proportion of people living below the poverty line; they constitute 41 percent compared to 59 percent men in formal public employment, they are under-represented in decision making positions and make up majority of subsistence farmers lacking access to and control of critical resources such as land, water and agricultural extension services.

“Ono is a typical example of the case of women’s vulnerability to climate change, which is also touching other issues like parenting because her ability to properly take care of her kids is seriously in doubt as a result of her current poor financial situation.”

In a reaction to Ono and Oru’s submissions, Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture, Yakub Olajide Basorun, says that he is unaware of the cases, even as he urges persons in such situations to make formal complaints to government. He adds that his officials provide complete information and assistance to farmers.

His words: “We give them technical, market and weather information to make them successful farmers. At Udena, we have a lot of farmers there growing rice successfully. It is not true that we don’t provide irrigation facilities. In fact, we provide everything that they require, and all they need to bring is their labour. Besides, the area falls within the Ogun-Osun River Basin, which is naturally flooded.”

Basorun notes that after such training programmes similar to the one Ono attended, government ends up selecting “those that meet the criteria.”

“But some withdraw afterwards when they are no longer able to cope with the realities on ground, thinking that it’s a bed of roses. But we have 200 people currently involved in the project.”

He emphasises that the ministry is currently intervening in a case involving migrant farmers like Oru elsewhere in the state. “Have the Igbe farmers come to government to make a complaint? Is the government aware of their problem? Of course, we are not. We are trying to solve a lot of problems related to flooding being encountered by migrant farmers like Oru and the one ongoing in Iba is a typical example.”

UN to tackle Nigeria desertification

The GEF Assembly
The GEF Assembly

The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) will assist Nigeria to tackle her environmental degradation challenges especially those related to aridification.

The agreement was reached recently in Cancun, Mexico at a bilateral meeting involving a Nigerian delegation led by Environment Minister Laurentia Mallam and a United Nations (UN) team headed by UNCCD Executive Secretary, Monique Barbut, during the Fifth Assembly of the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

Barbut described Nigeria “as the biggest and legitimate voice in Africa,” promising that she would flag-off the intervention with a visit President Goodluck Jonathan before the year’s end.

Environment Minister, Laurentia Mallam (right), with the Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Environment, Rabi Jimeta, during the 5th GEF Assembly in Cancun, Mexico. Behind them is Assistant Director and GEF Desk Officer, Halima Kolo Mohammed
Environment Minister, Laurentia Mallam (right), with the Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Environment, Rabi Jimeta, during the 5th GEF Assembly in Cancun, Mexico. Behind them is Assistant Director and GEF Desk Officer, Halima Kolo Mohammed

The meeting also attracted dignitaries such as Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Environment, Rabi Jimeta; Director PRS/GEF Operational Focal Point; D. M. Dauda; Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Ibrahim Thiaw; and Director General, United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO), Li Yong.

Barbut underlined the need for countries to look more at the issues of drought being the highest human killer than any other crises in the world as, according to her, issues of land degradation and security pose more threat to livelihood of people especially Africans, which makes them poor.

She urged African countries to consider more seriously issues of land degradation which will along the line tackle problems related to climate change, biodiversity and pollution, while promoting Sustainable Land Management (SLM).

“African countries should come up with some concrete projects on land degradation management through synergy to tackle the issue of environmental degradation. African countries should do more in proper management of land than to consider its reclamation which is more expensive and in turn has negative effect on food security,” she stated.

Yong assured the role of UNIDO in promoting green growth in industries, noting that the body recently adopted a new mandate to make sustainability central to industrial development. He said future developments would be based on low-carbon technologies, even as he outlined a range of strategies UNIDO is adopting to support sustainable industrial development to include: getting public sector policies right; boosting knowledge networks to promote innovation and trade; and looking for synergies between international organisations’ green growth approaches to facilitate investment flows. He suggested that GEF-Nigeria and UNIDO work together in these areas under GEF-6.

Thiaw, on his part, advocated the need for Nigeria to work with UNEP on food security under the GEF-6, adding that Nigeria should seek for soft loans to form part of her co-financing mechanism.

While three projects were approved for Nigeria under the GEF-6 (Sixth Cycle), the Council endorsed the Work Programme comprising 37 new and two resubmitted project concepts, one non-expedited enabling activity, and one programmatic approach.

Nigeria, believed to be the only country (apart from Mexico) to fully participate in the Fifth GEF Assembly’s exhibition among the 183 member states, urged the GEF to assist countries in recovering degraded land and educating small-scale farmers to enhance food production and improve farmers’ livelihoods.

While Ethiopia stated that infrastructure plays a key role in building a nexus between energy, food and water issues. Saint Lucia proposed discussing trade and investment policies that promote investments in carbon-intensive infrastructure over renewable energy.

Furthermore, Senegal highlighted a national plan involving projects on agriculture and energy and wondered how the GEF could help countries pursue goals within such plans. Zambia, for the Southern Africa constituency, called on the GEF to support sustainable forest management, biodiversity, land degradation, climate change and chemicals management efforts in Southern Africa.

At the Nigerian GEF exhibition stand: Project Coordinator, Conservation and Management of the Biodiversity GEF-UNDP Project in the Niger Delta, Matthew Dore (left), with Project Coordinator, Promoting Energy Efficiency in Public and Residential Buildings GEF-UNDP Project, Etiosa Uyigue, in Cancun, Mexico
At the Nigerian GEF exhibition stand: Project Coordinator, Conservation and Management of the Biodiversity GEF-UNDP Project in the Niger Delta, Matthew Dore (left), with Project Coordinator, Promoting Energy Efficiency in Public and Residential Buildings GEF-UNDP Project, Etiosa Uyigue, in Cancun, Mexico

At the exhibition, Nigeria showcased her success stories and achievements over the past years in the implementation of GEF funded projects. While sharing knowledge on the peculiarity of the country and how GEF support has made a difference at all levels, officials demonstrated the linkages between the different ranges of project sizes and the existing strong partnerships with partners that have contributed to the successes experienced.

The Nigerian delegation also included delegates drawn from the Ministries of Environment and Finance, GEF Project Coordinators, Project Consultants and representatives of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs).

Lagos during rainstorm in pictures

0

 

A motorist needs help to "swim" through a flooded Obafem Awolowo Way, Ikeja,       Lagos.
A motorist needs help to “swim” through a flooded Obafem Awolowo Way, Ikeja, Lagos.
No train in sight rev up a wet and gloomy rail line community at Agege, Lagos
No train in sight to rev up a wet and gloomy rail line community at Agege, Lagos
Homes left in ruins after a rainstorm.
Homes left in ruins after a rainstorm.
Its not the flood water, but rather washed up planks, appear to create a barrier         along this street at Agege, Lagos.
Its not the flood water, but rather washed up planks, appear to create a barrier along this street at Agege, Lagos.
Motorists and cyclists wade through a flooded Akin Adesola Street, Victoria            Island, Lagos.
Motorists and cyclists wade through a flooded Akin Adesola Street, Victoria Island, Lagos.
Knee-deep flood at Agege, Lagos
Knee-deep flood at Agege, Lagos
 It's raining elephants and hippos at Ogba, Lagos.
It’s raining elephants and hippos at Ogba, Lagos.
Where's the church?
Where’s the church?

 

 Residents seem to have deserted this home at Ajegunle, Ikorodu, Lagos.
Residents seem to have deserted this home at Ajegunle, Ikorodu, Lagos.

Ojo, Sanchez demand urgent climate action

Dr Godwin Ojo of the Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) and Shenna Sanchez of the Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG) at the intersessional ministerial meeting of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) speak on behalf of global environmental groups, trade unions and youth groups, who had staged a walkout from the Warsaw Climate Conference to show indignation at alleged non-committal attitude of governments for, according to them, failure to take decisive and swift action against “the biggest threat to both people and the planet, and the continued domination and sabotage of the international climate talks by powerful corporate interests.”

 

 

Ojo
Ojo

Collectively we represent millions if not hundreds of millions of global citizens.

Civil society organisations (CSOs), indigenous groups and citizens’ networks, among others, call for an energy transformation towards peoples’ and community energy – a transformation that delivers renewable and clean energy for those with energy, the billions without access to energy as well as generating millions of new green jobs.

We are people who participated in the walkout of the Warsaw Climate Conference and those who supported and united with its call for more serious climate action. We have come together to reiterate to all ‘leaders’ participating in the UN climate negotiations that they are dangerously off-track in addressing the climate emergency. We call upon them to listen to the demands and solutions of people.

The walkout was an act of protest and indignation over governments’ continued failure to take decisive and swift action against the biggest threat to both people and the planet, and an act of condemnation of continued domination and sabotage of the international climate talks by powerful corporate interests.

In the face of massive destruction, displacement and loss of lives caused by current levels of global warming and the certainty of much worse impacts in the near future, governments continue to choose to act in the interests of a wealthy few, and collude with big business to defend unsustainable consumption and production models ahead of the urgent need for a sustainable, ecological, and just world.

We are more determined than ever to fight for the survival of our families, our communities and our peoples across the world – a survival that rests on nothing less than the fundamental transformation of a system that has generated massive impoverishment, injustices and a climate crisis that threatens all life on earth.  People are waging this fight in various arenas in every corner of the globe, over every dimension of their lives – food, energy, health and security, jobs and livelihoods.

People are mobilising everywhere and taking to the streets in bigger numbers and increasing intensity to stand up to vested interests and fight for their future and those of the next generations.  People-driven solutions, compatible with planetary limits, are being created and asserted at local, national and global levels – aimed at meeting the needs of people rather than the relentless pursuit of profits for big business and wealthy elites.

We  are back,  far more strengthened in giving voice to those who are already acting with the urgency needed to avoid the worst impacts of climate change –  the huge majority of civil society around the world that you, ministers, represent and cannot ignore any longer.

In the coming weeks and months, towards and during the Social COP in Venezuela, the People’s Summit and the COP20 in Peru, and the COP 21 in France, we will be fighting harder than ever for governments to:

  • Commit to a global goal of limiting warming that recognises the latest IPCC’s warnings on the threats of tipping points, and to the right to food and food sovereignty, recalling that science suggests that 1.5C of warming would be too much for many vulnerable peoples and countries;
  • Deliver a swift global transformation away from the use of dirty fossil fuel and destructive energy systems driving the crisis, towards a carbon-free and renewable energy economy that, primarily among others, is decentralised, community controlled, affordable, accessible to all people for their basic needs and well-being;
  • Urgently scale up targets for emissions cuts in the pre-2020 period, and set emission targets comparable to the scale of the emergency for 2020-2025;
  • Ensure equitable and fair sharing of efforts among all countries based on their historical responsibility, their capacities, and the urgency of the crisis;
  • Enable people to deal with climate impacts by protecting the rights of peoples and communities, building resilience, addressing loss and damage, and ensuring a just transition to climate resilient, low carbon, equitable and democratic economy and society;
  • Define and commit to concrete targets for the transfer of finance and technology to make global transformation possible; and,
  • Reject the damaging influence of corporate interests on climate policy and prevent their promotion of false solutions as the global response to the climate crisis.

The global climate movement is building its strength and power in every country of the world. We call on those who claim to represent us to either act in our interests or step aside.

Solar power for rural areas: The Jigawa experience

0

SolarThere is a revolution going on in Jigawa State. In what appears like the original blueprint for the Federal Government’s recently launched operation “Light-Up Rural Nigeria”, Governor Sule Lamido, right from the time he assumed office seven years ago, embarked on an aggressive programme of incubating a rural solar ecosystem. In pastoral communities which normally would never dream of seeing electricity in their midst because they are nowhere near the national grid, there suddenly comes power – street lights, electric powered boreholes, illuminations for homes, shops and Mosques – all supplied by the ever smiling sun over their habitat. So, overnight, Jigawa becomes home to clusters of off-grids, stand-alones and mini grids of renewable energy. Surely, were the much vaunted Peer Review Mechanism among states in Nigeria working as it should, by now, Lamido’s example would have catalysed a nationwide off-grid revolution.

Granted, the Federal Government last January announced a move towards rural off-grids; but that is painfully late. For a country that is so irradiated with solar ambience that even the foremost renewable energy-deploying Germany wished it had some fraction of our sunlight, it is an unforgivable sin to allow our poor rural community dwellers continue living in darkness, and choking from kerosene lanterns and sundry carbon-spewing light sources.

Jigawa’s rural electrification via solar power is relatively cheap and fast to replicate. It also has the dual function of lighting up the villages and creating jobs at the same time. The mode of selection of sites for the off-grid solar project is based on democratic rotation of projects around the state’s three Senatorial districts. Twenty seven villages have been covered already, while three shall be powered this year. In each selected community, more than 60 households are beneficiaries, and then the general village benefits from the centralised streetlights, Mosque lighting and solar boreholes.

Then, in the spirit of the state government’s policy thrust of rural empowerment, the government constructs right in the centre of the beneficiary village, a solar enterprise lock-up shops which are rented out to local entrepreneurs who use them as business centres while paying a monthly token to the government for maintenance of the infrastructure. There are barbers, tailors, chemists (which effectively serves as village dispensary) and battery charging station operators, and other rural artisans taking up the shops.

Therefore, right inside the hidden enclaves of Jigawa villages, one will be taken aback to stumble across a sudden paradise where there is solar lighting for home systems, solar street lighting, solar lighting for public facilities, battery charging stations, solar enterprise lock-up shops, solar motorised water boreholes, solar vaccine refrigerators, and solar lighting back-up systems. This has a great resemblance to the solar centre paradigm which is used in other renewable energy-savvy developing countries, like Kenya, for energy efficiency and social enterprise purposes.

According to a renewable energy expert who explained the concept adopted by the Jigawa State Government, “This project will strive to spawn a grass roots solar industry that can sustain its momentum with new jobs and businesses that focus on system installation and maintenance. The solar-powered micro-enterprise buildings are the project centrepieces in each village. Each centre provides electricity to six very small businesses that would otherwise not have access to electricity. The shared PV (photovoltaic) system, much less expensive than individual systems for each shop, allows tailors to move up from manual sewing machines to electric; barbers, from manual clippers to electric, and similar improvements in productivity for other types of businesses.”

During the Federal Government’s Light-Up Rural Nigeria launch earlier in the year in Abuja, President Goodluck Jonathan said that the project had been initiated under the second phase of his government’s power sector reform programme planned for the post-privatisation period. He said the initiative was conceived primarily to promote the use of renewable energy, thereby assisting the vision of providing reliable electricity supply to all Nigerians. He also said the project would go a long way in providing clean, cheap and reliable renewable energy that would address some of the challenges of climate change in the country.

I have a word for the government as it gets set to start its nationwide rural solar electrification project. Renewal energy programme is not sustainable without appropriate government policies and legal frameworks which can bring in the private sector to drive the process. In other parts of the world, renewable energy policies have translated to renewable energy laws. In Nigeria we are still stuck with policies. Plenty of high sounding master plans and blue prints, but no action. This is a great discouragement to foreign investors who want to come to Nigeria and invest in our richly endowed natural environment.

Without the appropriate laws – for instance, Feed in Tariff (known generally as FiT) and net metering rules – the planned nationwide renewable energy power projects shall end up as another cesspool of corruption and graft. What is more, after this government leaves office, and if the next government is not interested in it, which is more likely than not, this remarkable initiative shall become an abandoned project, and then the wheels of our renewable energy development will grind back to the starting point at ground zero.

In Jigawa State today, this is the big albatross facing the whole populace. They are all keeping their fingers crossed that the next governor would be as visionary, benevolent and environment-friendly as Lamido, who does not wait for international donors and development partners to fund the rural off-grid projects. His 100 per cent fund-allocation to the rural solar project effectively presents a sustainability question.  The project executors are now in the drawing board room cudgelling their brains to come up with probable post-2015 strategies for the laudable projects. One of the potential strategies is Public Private Partnership, which ironically still begs the question – without appropriate renewable energy laws, PPPs are nonstarters at best.

Experts all over the world aver that without proper government support, renewable energy projects cannot stand. In Nigeria, a scientific study has arrived at the same conclusion. In 2012, an investigation to know if off-grid electrification using solar photovoltaic panels is economically viable, conducted by Akpan Uduak Sylvester and Ishak Salisu Rabiu, was released. The “Electricity Access in Nigeria” investigation has the following to say.

“In line with the government’s target of ensuring 80 per cent electricity coverage in Nigeria by 2015, this study examined the viability of using solar photovoltaic panels in a decentralised off-grid electrification project for a typical rural community in Northern Nigeria. The choice of Northern Nigeria is based on its solar energy potential, and low population density. The study compared the total cost of providing electricity using solar PV panels for 25 years to a rural community of 50 households, and an electricity load of 82.7kilo watts with that of paying electricity tariffs assuming grid connection was possible.

“The results show that such project will not be economically viable at the prevailing commercial interest rate. However, the viability of the project significantly increases if there is adequate government support through the provision of low interest loans or financial grants (as production subsidy). Such subsidy will not result in economic waste since the target is clearly defined. Apart from government, financial incentives, removal of barriers to private investment e.g. legal and regulatory barriers and proper risk management will make the project more viable. The following recommendations are hereby made: Government should create support mechanisms to support private sector investment in off-grid electrification programmes to meet the 80 per cent electricity coverage by 2015; a clear legal and regulatory framework should be established to incorporate the private sector in the rural electrification plan.”

 

By Greg Odogwu

×