26.3 C
Lagos
Tuesday, February 4, 2025
Home Blog Page 2090

World Bank warns that damages from extreme weather are rising

0

Super Typhoon ruinsAs the global climate continues to change, the costs and damages from more extreme weather related to a warming planet are growing. While all countries are impacted, developing
nations bear the brunt of mounting losses in lives and livelihoods from increasingly severe floods, droughts, and storms.

“Typhoon Haiyan, the most powerful typhoon ever to hit the Philippines, has brought into sharp focus how climate change is intensifying the severity of extreme weather events, which hurts the poor the most,” said Jim Yong Kim, World Bank Group President. “While the immediate relief effort must be front and center of our attention today, such tragic events show that the world can no longer afford to put off action to slow greenhouse emissions, and help countries prepare for a world of greater climate and disaster risks.”

More can be done to help vulnerable countries adapt to climate change, as well as prepare for and respond to weather-related disasters, according to a new World Bank report released recently on the sidelines of the UN climate talks in Warsaw, Poland.

Titled “Building Resilience: Integrating Climate and Disaster Risk into Development,” the report looks at the gradual or slow-onset effects of climate change like sea-level rise, salinisation of freshwater sources and droughts, as well as extreme weather events like floods, heat-waves or cyclones.

Produced before Typhoon Haiyan left its deadly trail of destruction across the Philippines, the report describes the costs of weather disasters the lives and jobs lost as well as in losses and damages to private property and infrastructure, and their particular impact on the poor.

“Over the last 30 years, the world has lost more than 2.5 million people and almost $4 trillion to natural disasters. Economic losses are rising – from $50 billion each year in the 1980s, to just under $200 billion each year in the last decade. . And about three quarters of those losses are a
result of extreme weather,” said Rachel Kyte, World Bank Vice-President for Sustainable Development. “While you cannot connect any single weather event to climate change, scientists have warned that extreme weather events will increase in intensity if climate change is left unchecked.”

With a focus on lessons from World Bank Group experience, the new Bank report calls for national governments and the international development community to work across disciplines and sectors to build long-term resilience, reduce disaster risk and avoid unmanageable future costs.

The main findings include:

·         Loss and damages from disasters have been rising over the last three decades, from an annual average of around $50 billion in the 1980s to just under $200 billionn each year in the last decade. According to the reinsurance company, Munich Re, data, total reported losses from disasters are estimated at $3.8 trillion in the period from 1980 to 2012 with 74% due to extreme-weather.

·         Weather-related economic impacts are especially high in fast-growing, middle-income countries due to increasingly exposed, valuable assets. The average impact of disasters equaled 1% of GDP over the six years from 2001 to 2006, ten times higher than the average for high-income countries.

·         The impacts are particularly crippling in smaller and lower-income countries that are least able to cope. Hurricane Tomas, for example, devastated St Lucia in 2010 and wiped out the equivalent of 43% of GDP. In the Horn of Africa, the extended 2008-11 drought, which at its peak left 13.3 million people facing food shortages, caused estimated total losses of $12.1 billion in Kenya alone.

·         Climate and disaster-resilient development can save lives and livelihoods and protect the poor from climate shocks. Early warning systems have been proven to save countless lives worldwide, and typically yield benefits that are four to36 times higher than initial cost outlay. Cyclone Phailin which hit Odisha and Andrah Pradesh in 2013 resulted in 40 deaths after years of disaster risk prevention and preparedness, compared to the 10,000 who perished during a similar event in 1999.

·         There are big pay-offs despite upfront investment costs. Disaster assessment experience suggests it costs 10-50% more to build safer infrastructure than to replace original structures. For large-scale infrastructure it can be substantially higher. For example, following the 2008 floods in Namibia investments were needed to elevate roads and improve drainage in flood prone areas. This carried a cost 5.5 times the replacement value of damaged structures.

Much is known already on how to build resilience, but better cooperation is needed among relevant agencies and disciplines. The World Bank and other partners have accumulated a wealth of global expertise in resilient development – but it requires better harmonisation of climate and disaster management agendas to prevent fragmentation of local capacity and global resources.

COP 19: African CSOs demand full implementation of agreements

0

SONY DSCCivil society organisation (CSOs) across Africa have demanded that developed countries fulfil and implement their commitments under the UN climate convention, in order to fairly share a necessary “emissions budget,” and avoid catastrophic climate change.

At a press conference held immediately after the opening session of the 19th session of the UN Warsaw Climate Conference, the group said that Africa is in the frontline for climate change impacts.

“We watch with horror what has happened in the Philippines, and know that it is happening in our homes too,” Mithika Mwenda, the Secretary General of the Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA), said.

“I don’t know how rich countries can ignore the facts being screamed by mother nature, nor the cries being made by the world’s poor – the time has come to cut climate changing causing emissions and to cut them deep,” Mwende said.

“Africans expect our governments to stand firm on setting an emissions budget, as recommended by the IPCC. They must then share this budget fairly, based on historical responsibility and capacities,” said Dr. Habtemariam Abate, from Ethiopian Civil Society Network on Climate Change.

Salisu Dahiru, Head of Nigeria's UN-REDD Programme, in Warsaw, Poland
Salisu Dahiru, Head of Nigeria’s UN-REDD Programme, in Warsaw, Poland

“These negotiations are about the emissions budget, whether governments admit it or not, they either negotiate to share that budget fairly, or they plan to exceed it,” Dr Abate added.

“African civil society has strong and clear proposals for how to deliver energy to those who do not have it whilst avoiding the trap of dirty fossil fuels and therefore allowing us to live within the emissions budget. Proposals include a globally funded feed in tariff – we expect such a measure to be adopted here in Warsaw,” Azeb Girmai, from LDC Watch, said.

“Warsaw can be the moment the world chooses clean over dirty energy and Africa will be leading in that choice,” Girmai, said. “African people need an international mechanism to address loss and damage from climate change. That’s the reality. We see it every day. Perhaps the rich only see it on television – well they need to turn it on, watch it, learn, and then take responsibility for the suffering their emissions have caused.” Robert Chimambo, from Zambia Climate Change Network, said.

“The best agreement on Earth won’t make a difference without implementation in the real world. That’s why a clear outcome in Warsaw must be drastically scaled up climate finance and technology transfer. Only if those commitments are met can African governments really believe that the rich world plans to act in good faith on any future agreement,” said Agnes Banda from Malawi, one of the most vulnerable countries.

PACJA released several briefs outlining their analysis, shared with other civil society observers, on the issues of: Equity, Markets, Pledge and Review (form of the post-2020 agreement), and Global Feed in Tariff.

A continental coalition of CSOs from diverse backgrounds in Africa, PACJA has emerged as a vibrant CSO platform on climate change and sustainable development. With a membership of more than 500 organisations and networks, the Alliance brings together faith-based organisations, farmers and pastoralists` groups, community-based organisations, non-governmental organisations, trusts, and foundations, among other sectors with a common goal of promoting and advocating for pro-poor, climate-friendly and equity-based responses to climate change.

Proper positioning to access Green Climate Fund

0

Nigeria has taken up a campaign to build the capacity of national planners in order to strengthen the integration of climate change in national development plans and strategies. The initiative is based on a training module developed by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) office in partnership with the Department of Climate Change (DCC) in the Federal Ministry of Environment (FME).

According to the organisers, the training will be rolled out in the states to strengthen the country’s readiness and properly position it towards accessing the Green Climate Fund (GCF). This will likewise ensure that the facility is effectively utilised in alignment with national priorities. The training will also equip beneficiaries with the necessary skills for mainstreaming climate change into national and sub-national development programmes.

The GCF is a fund within the framework of the United Nations GCFFramework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) founded as a mechanism to transfer money from the developed to the developing world, in order to assist the developing countries in adaptation and mitigation practices to counter climate change. The GCF is based in the new Songdo district of IncheonSouth Korea. It is governed by a Board of 24 members and initially supported by an Interim Secretariat.

At a recent forum held in Abuja at the instance of the FME, UNDP, Economic Policy Analysis Centre (EPAC) and the National Planning Commission (NPC) to kick-start the scheme, policymakers and private sector players were given practical guidance on how climate change adaptation can be mainstreamed into development plans and strategies as part of measures to deal with impending climate threats in the country.

Participant trainees included representatives of FME, NPC, Energy Commission of Nigeria (ECN) as well as Ministries of Trade & Investments, Finance, Foreign Affairs, Health, and Women Affairs.

Director, CCD of the FME, Dr. Samuel Adejuwon, stated: “Let me reiterate that the ministry is committed to continuous delivery of robust leadership on national climate change governance and synergy with all stakeholders.”

Executive Secretary of the NPC, Ntufam Fidelis Ugbo, said that the Commission is determined to strengthen its on-going partnership with the FME and other relevant stakeholders in: promoting green growth through the global renewable energy system; adaptation of the protocols to Nigeria’s ecological uniqueness; pollution control and waste management; management of land degradation and desertification; environmental governance, sustainable use and conservation of natural resources; strengthening of institutional capacity of the relevant agencies, such as National Oil Sill, Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA), National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA) and National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA); and actualisation of the full implementation of the Great Green Wall (GGW) Programme in the frontline states of Kebbi, Sokoto, Zamfara, Katsina, Jigawa, Kano, Yobe, Borno and Gombe.

His words: “I wish to add that the issue of impact of climate change is not political, but a developmental issue that must be addressed collectively.  This was amply demonstrated by the 2012 floods which resulted to a huge human and material loss to the nation.  The impact provided a learning point for the nation.  It has become imperative to incorporate lessons from climate change in the design and implementation of our various development plans.”

Participants however lamented that awareness on issues of climate change is very low especially amongst vulnerable groups. They likewise frowned at the weak political will to drive climate change issues as well as a weak funding mechanism and institutional framework.

They urged government to put in place a system of dissemination of data and to embark on human and infrastructure capacity building for all aspects of mainstreaming climate change into national development.

The trainees clamoured the deployment of appropriate methods for the development of functional and sustainable database, adding that an elaborate advocacy and awareness programme should be embarked upon.

They resolved: “A coordinating institution should be established to oversee the mainstreaming of climate change into development activities. Apart from promoting activities that enhance energy efficiency and conservation, partnership should be strengthened with development partners, organised private sector and non-governmental organisations (NGOs).

“The authorities should also promote activities that will support green economy, increase industrialisation and reduce pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. While establishing adequate funding mechanism, appropriate technologies should be developed for sound management of non-biodegradable and biodegradable wastes from ‘cradle’ to ‘grave’.”

Dangers of Lead in paints

0

PaintsA team of civil society organisations (CSOs) that met recently in Lagos has joined the global campaign to eliminate Lead in paint.

The activists observed that, in 2002, at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), governments (including the Nigerian government) agreed a goal that, by 2020, chemicals should be used and produced in ways that lead to the minimisation of significant adverse effects on human health and the environment.

Seven years later at the second session of the International Conference on Chemicals Management (ICCM) in 2009, several chemical issues were identified by consensus to be international priority issues of concern. One of these emerging policy issues is Lead in paints.

In response to the ICCM decision, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) jointly initiated a global partnership (Global Alliance to Eliminate Lead Paint – GAELP) to eliminate the use of lead compounds in paints in order to protect public health and the environment.

Lead, along with other heavy metals of concern, are present in many products, including children’s toys and paints, and in electronic products and wastes, contributing to unacceptable exposures to children and other vulnerable groups.

Lead use in paints pose special concerns because of their permanence and potential for serious harm to the environment and human health, especially of children, pregnant women and future generations.

Over 700 under-five children died from Lead poisoning to date and another over 3,000 still requiring treatment from the Lead poisoning incident which occurred in Zamfara State in 2010.

In 2009, SRADev Nigeria, one of the CSOs, carried out a study to analyse 30 paints sampled from the Lagos market. The result showed that all exceeded permitted lead levels far beyond the recommended limit of 90ppm, rising to alarming levels of 129,837ppm.

However, there is no acceptable blood lead level in children that is considered safe and even relatively low levels of exposure can cause irreversible neurological damage and in some cases adverse lifelong effects, such as decreased intelligence, poor school performance, mental retardation and violent behavior.

The activists expressed encouragement by the successful findings from the global studies on Lead in Decorative Paints” and the alarming high levels above permissible limits particularly found in Nigerian paint samples.

Mindful that the awareness of policy makers and the general public about the risks of Lead and other heavy metals to human health and the environment is often very low, particularly in Nigeria, they expressed concern that Nigeria has yet no regulatory standards for Lead in paints, leaving the general public at the mercy of paint manufacturers.

The gathering that many alternatives to Lead as a drying agent in paint production such as zirconium, metallic zinc, cobalt, and metallic calcium, among others, exists requiring no change in technology to substitute any of these in paint production.

Against this background, they made an urgent call to action on the need for society to adopt essential precautionary and preventive policies and practices to ensure a lead-safe environment for all kids through advocacy at the national and state levels for regulatory frameworks to promote the establishment of an appropriate legal and regulatory framework to control the manufacture, import, export, sale and use of lead paints and products coated with lead paints should be discouraged towards complete elimination.

They underlined the need for awareness campaigns to inform the public about the hazards of lead exposure, especially in children; the presence of lead decorative paints for sale and use on the national market; lead paint as a significant source of childhood lead exposure; and availability of technically superior and safer alternatives.

They like wise underscored the need for voluntary action and labelling, such that paint manufacturers are encouraged to eliminate lead compounds from their paint formulations, especially of those paints likely to contribute to lead exposure in children and others. Paint manufacturers also are encouraged to consider voluntary participation in programmes that provide third party paint certification that no lead has been added to their paint, and to label products in ways that help consumers identify paints that do not contain added lead.

They added: “There is immediate need to enact mandatory national regulations for limiting lead concentrations in paints. Also, urgent effort needs to be put in place to eliminate lead in paint as was achieved in petrol phase out.

“There should be a complete ban and eradication of continued sale of leaded paints. Put in place regulatory mechanism towards adulterated, unregistered, unlabelled, repackaged and uncertified paint products. We believe that national re-branding should by synonymous with product re-branding. Government should set example by prohibiting procurement (purchasing) of paint products with Lead.”

Greenhouse gas atmospheric concentrations escalate

Greenhouse gasThe amount of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere reached a new record high in 2012, continuing an upward and accelerating trend which is driving climate change and will shape the future of our planet for hundreds and thousands of years.

A GHG is a gas in an atmosphere that absorbs and emits radiation within the thermal infrared range. This process is the fundamental cause of the greenhouse effect.The primary greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere are water vapourcarbon dioxide CO2), methanenitrous oxide, and ozone.

A recent edition of the World Meteorological Organisation’s annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin released last week shows that, between 1990 and 2012, there was a 32 percent increase in radioactive forcing – the warming effect on our climate – because of CO2 and other heat-trapping long-lived gases such as methane and nitrous oxide.

Carbon dioxide, mainly from fossil fuel-related emissions, accounted for 80 percent of this increase. The atmospheric increase of CO2 from 2011 to 2012 was higher than its average growth rate over the past ten years, according to the Greenhouse Gas Bulletin.

Since the start of the industrial era in 1750, the global average concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by 41 percent, methane by 160 percent and nitrous oxide by 20 percent.

“The observations from WMO’s extensive Global Atmosphere Watch network highlight yet again how heat-trapping gases from human activities have upset the natural balance of our atmosphere and are a major contribution to climate change,” said WMO Secretary-General, Michel Jarraud.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its recent 5th Assessment Report stressed that atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years,” he said.

“As a result of this, our climate is changing, our weather is more extreme, ice sheets and glaciers are melting and sea levels are rising,” said Jarraud.

“According to the IPCC, if we continue with ‘business as usual,’ global average temperatures may be 4.6 degrees Centigrade higher by the end of the century than pre-industrial levels – and even higher in some parts of the world. This would have devastating consequences,” he said.

“Limiting climate change will require large and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. We need to act now, otherwise we will jeopardise the future of our children, grandchildren and many future generations,” said Jarraud. “Time is not on our side,” he added.

Healthcare waste management policy formulated

0

Healthcare waste“Wastes are substances or objects, which are disposed of or are intended to be disposed of or are required to be disposed of by the provision of national law. It is therefore necessary for there to be proper management of medical waste to in order to ensure healthier environment and people.”

These were the words of the Managing Director, Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA), Ola Oresanya, at the 2013 edition of the National Healthcare Waste Management Summit held recently. The event had “Healthcare waste management and the environment” as its theme.

Oresanya explained that waste goes beyond just disposal when it comes to healthcare waste. “The elements of proper waste management have to be applied due to its delicate and hazardous nature. Healthcare wastes have a peculiar nature because they are not regular materials at dumb sites. When seen, people and even waste handlers tend to mishandle it thereby exposing themselves to the hazards inherent in them like injuries and infections,” he submitted.

He recalled that, in 2005, a seven-year-old boy in Ketu in Lagos was found playing around with used syringes which was found to have been indiscriminately disposed at a refuse dump. He added that, in 2011, three hospitals were shut-down in the Orile area of Lagos due to their indiscriminate healthcare waste disposal.

Oresanya stressed that LAWMA would continue to ensure that medical waste from hospitals and diagnostic laboratories are properly managed at all levels in the state.

Lagos State Commissioner of The Environment, Tunji Bello, disclosed that the Healthcare Waste Management Policy Bill being facilitated by LAWMA had been approved and signed by the Lagos State Government and would take effect in 2014.

The event included an Institutional Awards Presentations to several medical institutions in Lagos, including Premier Specialist Hospital on Victoria Island, Nigerian Navy Medical Centre Navy Town in Ojo, General Hospital in Apapa and the Health Facility Monitoring and Accreditation Agency (HEFAMAA).

Dr. (Mrs.) Adeola Eko-Pacheco, the only recipient of an individual award, received Best Medical Private Sector Participation (PSP) Manager. Eko-Pacheco applauded LAWMA for its consistent advocacy on proper waste management and rated the agency high on its healthcare waste initiatives.

The National Healthcare Waste Management Summit is an annual event where stakeholders in the health sector come together to map out ways to ensure standard practice is maintained and to award exceptional medical practitioners.

 

By Tina Armstrong-Ogbonna

How Nigeria will be prominent at COP 19

1
Haruna
Haruna

Nigeria has disclosed that its participation at the 19th Session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) holding in Warsaw, Poland will enable it ensure that its concerns as a developing nation as well as an oil producing country are effectively guided and presented.

Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Environment (FME), Taiye Haruna, who made the disclosure recently in Abuja at a Media Roundtable organised in preparation for the COP, added that the participation would further assist to strengthen existing partnerships/network and also establish other appropriate ones to move the nation forward towards the achievement of its economic transformation agenda.

“I want to therefore assure you that the ministry is committed to implementing the overall mandate of the Climate Change Convention and its Protocol. This present administration acknowledges that inaction is even more expensive as it will hinder the actualisation of Mr. President’s Transformation Agenda and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs),” he said.

But he expressed disappointment with “the lack of ambition in the outcomes on the part of Annex 1 countries’ mitigation and finance commitment”, adding that the last conference (COP 18 in Doha, Qatar) had “paved the way for a new phase, focusing on the implementation of the outcomes from negotiations under the AWG-KP and AWG-LCA, and advancing negotiations under the Ad-hoc Working Group on Durban Platform (ADP).

Haruna recalled that COP 18 focused on ensuring the implementation of agreements reached at previous conferences.

His words: “The outcome of the COP 18 ‘Doha Gateway’ decisions included amendments to the Kyoto Protocol to establish its Second Commitment Period. Having been launched at First Commitment Period (CMP 1) in 2005, the Ad-hoc Working Group on Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP) terminated its work in Doha.

“Ad-hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) and negotiations under the Bali Action Plan were also terminated at the conference. Key elements of the outcome also included agreement to consider Loss and Damage, ‘such as’ institutional mechanism to address loss and damage in developing countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change.”

Participants at the Roundtable examined issues related to climate change communication, effects of social media on development of small scale adaptations projects in local communities, and the politics of climate change.

Resource persons included: Dr Samuel Adejuwon (Director, Department of Climate Change at the FME), Prof. Olukayode Oladipo (climatologist and negotiator), Prof. Adeniyi  Osuntogun (agricultural economist and negotiator) and Michael Simire (urban planner and climate change communication specialist).

Africa takes stand ahead Warsaw climate conference

0
Christiana Figueres, UNFCCC Executive Secretary
Christiana Figueres, UNFCCC Executive Secretary

African nations have resolved to take a common position as the basis for negotiations on strengthening the international climate change regime through full, effective and sustained implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol (KP).

While agreeing that the key messages on negotiations for the 19th session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 19) scheduled to hold this month in Warsaw, Poland should guide and inform discussions by the African group, African environment ministers who met recently in Gaborone, Botswana, affirmed that the UNFCCC and KP constitute the fundamental global legal instrument on climate change, and that the climate change negotiations in Warsaw under the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action should be in conformity with the principles of the Convention and lay a solid foundation for the completion of negotiations at the COP 21 to be held in Paris, France in 2015.

The minister resolved to call for outcomes of COP 19 that are based on science, equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, reflecting the latest scientific, technical, economic and social information as, according to them, these outcomes will significantly influence efforts to secure sustainable development for Africa.

Similarly, the ministers reaffirmed at the fifth special session of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment that a long-term global goal must include ambitious short-term, medium-term and long-term mitigation commitments by Annex I parties reflecting their historical responsibilities and an equitable and appropriate contribution to the global effort, as well as the provision of adequate means of implementation, including finance, technology and capacity-building, to enable Africa to address its adaptation needs in particular.

They declared in the Gaborone Declaration – released at the close of the two-day session – to encourage Annex I parties to the UNFCCC that are not undertaking commitments under the second commitment period of the KP to undertake commitments under the Convention that are comparable in magnitude and effort to those undertaken under the Protocol and that are measurable, reportable and verifiable through an agreed set of common accounting rules and a compliance framework.

Furthermore, the ministers resolved to call on developed country parties to urgently scale up support for the implementation of adaptation measures and national adaptation plans, particularly through the Cancun Adaptation Framework and the Nairobi Work Programme, and to support and expedite work to understand, reduce and compensate for loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change, including its impacts on agriculture.

Likewise, they agreed that the national adaptation plan process should not be prescriptive, but should rather facilitate country-owned, country-driven action, that the formulation of national adaptation plans should build on and complement existing adaptation planning, and that financial and technical support should be provided to African countries to enable the development of the national adaptation plans.

The ministers agreed to recognise and support the Africa Adaptation Knowledge Network as the continental network for coordinating, facilitating, harnessing and strengthening the exchange of information and knowledge for climate change adaptation.

They urged the Green Climate Fund (GCF) Board, in its capacity as an operating entity of the UNFCCC, to allocate increased funding for climate change adaptation in Africa once the Fund becomes operational.

The ministers reaffirmed that agriculture must be treated under adaptation because of its status as a means of livelihood and the backbone of the African economy. They added that agriculture is a priority for Africa and should be treated as a matter of survival, recommending that a comprehensive work programme covering finance, technology transfer and capacity‑building to support sustainable agricultural production in developing countries be established under the Cancun Adaptation Framework, with support from developed countries.

Relevant institutions, including the African Development Bank (ADB) and other regional development banks and partners, were called upon to assist African countries in accessing funding available through the GCF and other global climate funds, and further enhancing their capacity for direct access.

They called for the work to enhance ambition under the Durban Platform to adequately address the need to limit the increase of global average temperature to well below 2.0 degrees Celsius, and to emphasise in this context the urgent need to reflect ambitious commitments under the Bali Road Map in order for Annex I parties to reduce their emissions by at least 40 per cent  by 2017 as an equitable and appropriate contribution to achieving the objective of the Convention.

The ministers called for efforts under the Durban Platform to enhance ambition leading to the development of a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention by 2015 to enter into force by 2020 to reflect all the principles and the provisions of the Convention, including equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in order to limit the increase of global average temperature to well below 2.0 degrees Celsius while ensuring equitable access to sustainable development and the sharing of atmospheric space and resources taking into account cumulative historical responsibility and the use of such resources by Annex I parties.

They urged all African countries to participate actively at COP 19.

Incorporating sound chemicals management in MDGs, Vision 20/2020 dreams

0

Chemical PixExperts have underlined the need for a well-coordinated mechanism that would ensure the eventual incorporation of sound chemicals management priorities and recommended activities in the Vision 20/2020 document. They likewise observed that the endeavour is essential to attaining the millennium development goals (MDGs).

Besides the overlapping of organisational responsibilities at the national, regional and local levels, they are however worried that activities of bodies charged with the responsibility of ensuring that chemicals do not present adverse effects to human health and the environment are inadequately coordinated, thereby resulting in gaps in the area of importation, registration, use/handling, disposal, compliance monitoring/enforcement, as well as workers’ health/safety.

The eggheads gathered last week in Abuja at the instance of the Nigeria-United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) project on Mainstreaming Sound Management of Chemicals (SMC) into MDG-based Development Plans and Policies. Funded by the Swedish Chemicals Agency (KEMI), the project came to a formal close on Tuesday as participants gathered to review the SMC Roadmap.

Hitherto, the project had: developed, reviewed and endorsed a National SMC Situation Report; endorsed two key SMC priority issues for Nigeria; developed, reviewed and endorsed concept note document for SMC priority issues; developed, reviewed and endorsed policy options to address the identified SMC priority issues; developed, reviewed and endorsed cost of action document to address identified SMC priority issues; developed, reviewed and endorsed cost benefit analysis document to justify government expenditure on SMC; and, developed the SMC action plan/roadmap.

In line with the project document, the developed action plan/roadmap was subjected to stakeholder review and endorsement at a daylong venture that officially ended the Mainstreaming SMC project.

Drawing over a hundred participants from government, academia, private sector, professional associations, media and non-governmental organisations, the project sought to: qualify the links between priority major chemical management problem areas, identify areas of the national chemical management governance regime that needs strengthening most urgently, develop a realistic phased plan for strengthening the national chemical management governance regime, assist to quantify the costs of inaction/benefits of action in planning/finance/economic language regarding major chemical management problem, and propose a path forward to mainstream the highest priority chemical management issues in Nigeria’s MDG-based development planning.

At the end of last week’s event, participants urged government to leverage resources for the implementation of conceptualised projects to address SMC priorities in Nigeria as, according to them, implementing it would bring about poverty reduction, improve maternal health, reduce infant mortality, increase child enrolment in school and ultimately pave way for the most desired sustainable development of man and the environment.

Apart from including in their annual capital budget proposals, relevant projects articulated in the SMC document, government organisations were advised to seize the opportunity of the ongoing review process by the National Planning Commission (NPC) and endeavour to include projects and programmes articulated in the national SMC action plan/document while submitting proposals to the NPC.

Essentially, the SMC report identified 11 SMC priority areas, which included: Constitutional Provision for Governance through Enabling Policy and Legislative Framework for SMC in Nigeria; Government Institutional Capacity; Risk Assessment; Risk Management; Risk Communication Strategies for Awareness Raising, Outreach and Education; Remediation; National Waste Management Strategy for Toxic and Hazardous Wastes; Emergency Prevention, Preparedness and Response; Diagnosis and Treatment for Intoxication; Knowledge and Information; and Illegal International Trans-boundary Movement and Dumping of Wastes.

On extensive deliberation on the review of the draft national situation report, four of the above-mentioned SMC priorities were further condensed by consensus to two. They included: Strengthening SMC Governance, legal framework and institutional infrastructure including capacity building and mainstreaming of SMC; and Risk Management including hazards communication strategies for awareness raising, outreach and education.

On subjecting the endorsed SMC priorities to policy option analysis, the cost of taking action to mitigate the adverse impact of chemicals on human health and the environment amounts to $405.3 million over a four-year period (2014-2017).

The cost benefit analysis study carried out in the course of the SMC project supported taking action to improve sound management of chemicals to move forward the country’s development agenda. The analysis further demonstrated that benefits expected from mainstreaming SMC are significant, diverse and permanent.

Participants described the net present value (NPV) as positive, even when sensitivity analysis was carried out and costs increased and benefits decreased, the NPV was still positive and the benefit/cost ratio was 1.56.

The project was considered viable and recommended for execution. The action plan/roadmap for mainstreaming of SMC into the 2nd National Implementation Plan for the Vision 20/2020 document (2014-2017) has been drawn, targeting the on-going review process of the first implementation plan.

×